Clinical Utility Of Genetic Testing Research Articles

Pathogenic Gene Variants Identified in Patients Presenting With Perthes or Perthes-like Hip Disorder.

Legg-Calve-Perthes disease (LCPD) is a diagnosis of exclusion. Various conditions, such as skeletal dysplasias, can closely mimic LCPD and these must be ruled out to provide appropriate treatment, prognosis, and counseling. Traditionally, genetic testing has not been readily available in pediatric orthopaedic practice. Furthermore, the clinical value of genetic testing patients with LCPD is unclear. With the advance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, genetic testing has become clinically available as a lab test. The purposes of this study were to assess the clinical utility of genetic testing in select patients with LCPD and to determine the patient characteristics of those who tested positive for skeletal dysplasia. This is an IRB-approved, retrospective study of 63 consecutive patients who presented with Perthes-like symptoms and/or x-ray findings and who had genetic testing. The reason(s) for genetic testing included bilateral hip disease, family history of LCPD, short stature, suspected skeletal dysplasia, atypical radiographic findings, and/or combinations of these reasons. Of the 63 patients, 19 patients (30%) were found to have a pathogenic gene variant. In 8 of the 19, a variety of skeletal dysplasia was diagnosed. The remaining 11 patients were found to be carriers of autosomal recessive disorders. All 19 patients were referred for genetic counseling. Of the 8 patients found to have skeletal dysplasia, 3 had bilateral disease, 3 were <10 percentile in height, 1 had a family history of "LCPD," and 3 had atypical x-ray findings. In addition to the pathogenic variants, numerous genetic variants of unknown significance were found with 2 gene variants showing exactly the same variant found in 2 unrelated patients. With 30% of the patients showing pathogenic results, genetic testing of select patients with Perthes-like disease is valuable in detecting an underlying genetic disorder or a carrier status of a genetic disorder.

Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Yield of Genetic Testing for Inherited Neuromuscular Disorders in a Single, Large Neuromuscular Center.

Most published studies on the clinical utility of genetic testing for neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) focus on disease-specific cohorts and/or involve multiple centers. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical utility and diagnostic yield of genetic testing at a single, large neuromuscular center. Unlike previous studies, this study is unique in that it includes a broad array of patients at a single, large neuromuscular center, providing real-world data that may assist both neuromuscular specialists as well as general neurologists in decision-making regarding the need for genetic testing in patients with suspected NMDs. Genetic testing results were reviewed for all patients who underwent testing through a single genetic testing company for NMDs in this single laboratory at a large neuromuscular center from 2015 to 2020. Retrospective chart reviews were performed to determine whether genetic testing results conferred a specific NMD diagnosis, including cases where a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was identified. Genetic testing was pursued for 192 patients. A positive result, defined as a pathogenic mutation, a VUS, or both, was found in 77.1%. A definitive diagnosis was conferred in 35.9%. The most common testing indication was suspected neuropathy (53.3%), and the indication with the highest diagnostic yield was suspected myopathy (48.7%). This study provides further evidence of the clinical utility of genetic testing for NMDs in a real-world setting with over one-third of patients tested receiving a definitive diagnosis. Over time, genetic testing will continue to become increasingly accessible, cost-effective, and sensitive, which will lead to even more utilization.

Clinical Utility of Genetic Testing with Geographical Locations in ADPKD: Describing New Variants.

Background: Our study aims to comment on all ADPKD variants identified in our health area and explain how they are distributed geographically, to identify new variants, and relate the more frequent variants with their renal phenotype in terms of kidney survival. Materials and Methods: We identified patients suffering from ADPKD in a specialized consultation unit; genealogical trees were constructed from the proband. According to the ultrasound-defined modified Ravine-Pei criteria, relatives classified as at risk were offered participation in the genetic study. Socio-demographic, clinical, and genetic factors related to the impact of the variant on the survival of the kidney and the patient, such as age at RRT beginning and age of death, were recorded. Results: In 37 families, 33 new variants of the PKD1 gene were identified, which probably produce a truncated protein. These variants included 2 large deletions, 19 frameshifts, and 12 stop-codons, all of which had not been previously described in the databases. In 10 families, six new probably pathogenic variants in the PKD2 gene were identified. These included three substitutions; two deletions, one of which was intronic and not associated with any family; and one duplication. A total of 11 missense variants in the PKD1 gene were grouped in 14 families and classified as probably pathogenic. We found that 33 VUS were grouped into 18 families and were not described in the databases, while another 15 were without grouping, and there was only 1 in the PKD2 gene. Some of these variants were present in patients with a different pathogenic variant (described or not), and the variant was probably benign. Renal survival curves were compared to nonsense versus missense variants on the PKD1 gene to check if there were any differences. A group of 328 patients with a nonsense variant was compared with a group of 264 with a missense variant; mean renal survival for truncated variants was lower (53.1 ± 0.46 years versus non-truncated variant 59.1 ± 1.36 years; Log Rank, Breslow, and Tarone Ware, p < 0.05). Conclusions: To learn more about ADPKD, it is necessary to understand genetics. By describing new genetic variants, we are approaching creation of an accurate genetic map of the disease in our country, which could have prognostic and therapeutic implications in the future.

Clinical utility of genetic testing in Indian children with kidney diseases

BackgroundKidney diseases with genetic etiology in children present with an overlapping spectrum of manifestations. We aimed to analyze the clinical utility of genetic testing in the diagnosis and management of suspected genetic kidney diseases in children.MethodsIn this retrospective study, children ≤ 18 years in whom a genetic test was ordered were included. Clinical indications for genetic testing were categorized as Glomerular diseases, nephrolithiasis and/or nephrocalcinoses, tubulopathies, cystic kidney diseases, congenital abnormality of kidney and urinary tract, chronic kidney disease of unknown aetiology and others. Clinical exome sequencing was the test of choice. Other genetic tests ordered were sanger sequencing, gene panel, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and karyotyping. The pathogenicity of the genetic variant was interpreted as per the American College of Medical Genetics classification.ResultsA total of 86 samples were sent for genetic testing from 76 index children, 8 parents and 2 fetuses. A total of 74 variants were reported in 47 genes. Out of 74 variants, 42 were missense, 9 nonsense, 12 frameshifts, 1 indel, 5 affected the splicing regions and 5 were copy number variants. Thirty-two were homozygous, 36 heterozygous and 6 were hemizygous variants. Twenty-four children (31.6%) had pathogenic and 11 (14.5%) had likely pathogenic variants. Twenty-four children (31.6%) had variants of uncertain significance. No variants were reported in 17 children (22.3%). A genetic diagnosis was made in 35 children with an overall yield of 46%. The diagnostic yield was 29.4% for glomerular diseases, 53.8% for tubular disorders, 81% for nephrolithiasis and/or nephrocalcinoses, 60% for cystic kidney diseases and 50% for chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology. Genetic testing made a new diagnosis or changed the diagnosis in 15 children (19.7%).ConclusionNearly half (46%) of the children tested for a genetic disease had a genetic diagnosis. Genetic testing confirmed the clinical diagnoses, changed the clinical diagnoses or made a new diagnosis which helped in personalized management.

New insights from trio whole-exome sequencing in the children with kidney disease: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Kidney disease of children markedly affects their health and development. Limited clinical data of early-stage kidney disease render a tremendous challenge for the accurate diagnosis. Trio whole-exome sequencing (Trio-WES) is emerging as a first-line diagnostic strategy in pediatric kidney disease, and shows important implications for the precision medicine strategies of children with kidney disease. Trio-WES was performed in 133 Chinese children with kidney disease and their parents. The results for casual variants in genes known to cause kidney disease were analyzed. We further assessed the genetic diagnostic yield and the clinical implications of genetic testing. An overall diagnostic yield of 52.63% (70/133) was found, and the diagnostic rates ranged from 44.74% to 59.62% in different clinical phenotypes. The diagnostic yield of the three groups of simple proteinuria, renal insufficiency, and "other" was 50%, 50%, and 54.55%, respectively. Eight-seven diagnostic variants were identified in 70 probands with variants spanning 30 genes. The top 7 genes with diagnostic variants were COL4A5 (23, 26.44%), COL4A4 (13, 14.94%), ADCK4 (7, 8.05%), CLCN5 (3, 3.45%), ACE (3, 3.45%), PKD1 (3, 3.45%), and SLC12A3 (3, 3.45%), accounting for 63.22% of all variations in the cohort. The retrospective cohort study summarized the clinical utility of genetic testing in 133 probands, and expanded the phenotypic and genetic profiles of kidney disease in children. Trio-WES is an efficient diagnostic tool for children with kidney disease, which facilitates the clinical diagnosis and treatment. Our findings have important implications for the precise diagnosis of childhood nephropathy and may provide clinical guideline for disease management.

Genetic Predisposition to Colorectal Cancer: How Many and Which Genes to Test?

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common tumors, and genetic predisposition is one of the key risk factors in the development of this malignancy. Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis are the best-known genetic diseases associated with hereditary colorectal cancer. However, some other genetic disorders confer an increased risk of colorectal cancer, such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome (TP53 gene), MUTYH-associated polyposis (MUTYH gene), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (STK11 gene), Cowden syndrome (PTEN gene), and juvenile polyposis syndrome (BMPR1A and SMAD4 genes). Moreover, the recent advances in molecular techniques, in particular Next-Generation Sequencing, have led to the identification of many new genes involved in the predisposition to colorectal cancers, such as RPS20, POLE, POLD1, AXIN2, NTHL1, MSH3, RNF43 and GREM1. In this review, we summarized the past and more recent findings in the field of cancer predisposition genes, with insights into the role of the encoded proteins and into the associated genetic disorders. Furthermore, we discussed the possible clinical utility of genetic testing in terms of prevention protocols and therapeutic approaches.

Geriatricians' Perspectives on the Multiple Dimensions of Utility of Genetic Testing for Alzheimer's Disease: A Qualitative Study.

Research advancements in Alzheimer's disease (AD) raise opportunities for genetic testing to improve diagnostic and risk assessment. Despite emerging developments, it is unclear how geriatricians perceive the potential clinical and personal utility of genetic testing for their patients. Geriatricians' perspectives are essential to understanding potential ethical, policy, and clinical challenges. In this paper, we report on geriatricians' perspectives on the utility of genetic testing for AD. Semi-structured interviews with California geriatricians within different practices settings to collect and characterize their perspectives on genetic testing for AD. We used an adapted grounded theory approach to analyze recorded and transcribed interviews. We identified geriatricians' (n = 10) perspectives on the clinical and personal utility of testing, alongside their views on clinical care approaches for older adults. Geriatricians perceived minimal clinical utility of genetic testing for AD, though that may change with the availability of disease-modifying therapies. Yet, they recognized the potential personal utility of testing (e.g., assisting with future financial planning). Finally, geriatricians expressed concerns regarding patients' anxiety from learning about genetic status, particularly through direct-to-consumer (DTC) testing. Our data highlight that the decision to order genetic testing requires clinical and ethical considerations, including balancing limited clinical utility with the potential personal utility. Although DTC testing is available, geriatricians perceive that they have an important role in managing the decision to test and interpreting the results. Further research is needed to inform policy and ethical guidelines to support geriatricians' critical role to counsel patients considering clinical and DTC genetic testing.

Genetic diagnosis for adult patients at a genetic clinic.

Clinical utility of genetic testing has rapidly increased in the past decade to identify the definitive diagnosis, etiology, and specific management. The majority of patients receiving testing are children. There are several barriers for genetic tests in adult patients; barriers may arise from either patients or clinicians. Our study aims to realize the detection rate and the benefits of genetic tests in adults. We conducted a prospective study of 10 adult patients who were referred to a genetic clinic. Exome sequencing (ES) was pursued in all cases, and chromosomal microarray (CMA) was performed for six cases. Our result is impressive; six cases (60%) received likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants. Four definitive diagnosis cases had known pathogenic variants in KCNJ2, TGFBR1, SCN1A, and FBN1, whereas another two cases revealed novel likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants in GNB1 and DNAH9. Our study demonstrates the success in genetic diagnosis in adult patients: four cases with definitive, two cases with possible, and one case with partial diagnosis. The advantage of diagnosis is beyond obtaining the diagnosis itself, but also relieving any doubt for the patient regarding any previous questionable diagnosis, guide for management, and recurrence risk in their children or family members. Therefore, this supports the value of genetic testing in adult patients.

Diagnostic yield of candidate genes in an Australian corneal dystrophy cohort.

Corneal dystrophies describe a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of inherited disorders. The International Classification of Corneal Dystrophies (IC3D) lists 22 types of corneal dystrophy, 17 of which have been demonstrated to result from pathogenic variants in 19 identified genes. In this study, we investigated the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in a well‐characterised cohort of 58 individuals from 44 families with different types of corneal dystrophy. Individuals diagnosed solely with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy were excluded. Clinical details were obtained from the treating ophthalmologist. Participants and their family members were tested using a gene candidate and exome sequencing approach. We identified a likely molecular diagnosis in 70.5% families (31/44). The detection rate was significantly higher among probands with a family history of corneal dystrophy (15/16, 93.8%) than those without (16/28, 57.1%, p = .015), and among those who had undergone corneal graft surgery (9/9, 100.0%) compared to those who had not (22/35, 62.9%, p = .041). We identified eight novel variants in five genes and identified five families with syndromes associated with corneal dystrophies. Our findings highlight the genetic heterogeneity of corneal dystrophies and the clinical utility of genetic testing in reaching an accurate clinical diagnosis.

Systematic use of phenotype evidence in clinical genetic testing reduces the frequency of variants of uncertain significance.

Guidelines for variant interpretation include criteria for incorporating phenotype evidence, but this evidence is inconsistently applied. Systematic approaches to using phenotype evidence are needed. We developed a method for curating disease phenotypes as highly or moderately predictive of variant pathogenicity based on the frequency of their association with disease‐causing variants. To evaluate this method's accuracy, we retrospectively reviewed variants with clinical classifications that had evolved from uncertain to definitive in genes associated with curated predictive phenotypes. To demonstrate the clinical validity and utility of this approach, we compared variant classifications determined with and without predictive phenotype evidence. The curation method was accurate for 93%–98% of eligible variants. Among variants interpreted using highly predictive phenotype evidence, the percentage classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic was 80%, compared with 46%–54% had the evidence not been used. Positive results among individuals harboring variants with highly predictive phenotype‐guided interpretations would have been missed in 25%–37% of diagnostic tests and 39%–50% of carrier screens had other approaches to phenotype evidence been used. In summary, predictive phenotype evidence associated with specific curated genes can be systematically incorporated into variant interpretation to reduce uncertainty and increase the clinical utility of genetic testing.

Diagnostic validity and clinical utility of genetic testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveThis study summarises the diagnostic validity and clinical utility of genetic testing for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and their at-risk relatives.MethodsA systematic search was performed in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase,...

Importance of genetic testing in unexplained cardiac arrest.

AimsGenetic testing is recommended in specific inherited heart diseases but its role remains unclear and it is not currently recommended in unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA). We sought to assess the yield and clinical utility of genetic testing in UCA using whole-exome sequencing (WES).Methods and resultsSurvivors of UCA requiring external defibrillation were included from the Cardiac Arrest Survivor with Preserved Ejection fraction Registry. Whole-exome sequencing was performed, followed by assessment of rare variants in previously reported cardiovascular disease genes. A total of 228 UCA survivors (mean age at arrest 39 ± 13 years) were included. The majority were males (66%) and of European ancestry (81%). Following advanced clinical testing at baseline, the likely aetiology of cardiac arrest was determined in 21/228 (9%) cases. Whole-exome sequencing identified a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in 23/228 (10%) of UCA survivors overall, increasing the proportion of ‘explained’ cases from 9% only following phenotyping to 18% when combining phenotyping with WES. Notably, 13 (57%) of the 23 P/LP variants identified were located in genes associated with cardiomyopathy, in the absence of a diagnosis of cardiomyopathy at the time of arrest.ConclusionsGenetic testing identifies a disease-causing variant in 10% of apparent UCA survivors. The majority of disease-causing variants was located in cardiomyopathy-associated genes, highlighting the arrhythmogenic potential of such variants in the absence of an overt cardiomyopathy diagnosis. The present study supports the use of genetic testing including assessment of arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy genes in survivors of UCA.

Clinical Utility of Genomic Testing in Cancer Care.

PURPOSEIn the era of personalized medicine, physicians rely on their understanding of clinical utility to assess the value of rapidly evolving genetic and genomic tests. Current definitions of the clinical utility of genetic testing sufficiently capture a range of benefits and risks that derive from positive and negative results of tests that assess one gene or a few genes. However, these definitions of clinical utility are inadequate to recognize the wider scope of benefits that accrue from more comprehensive genomic tests, which can develop data sets that inform clinical decision making as well as population health and scientific advancement in novel ways.METHODSAn expert roundtable discussion with leaders from multiple sectors of the health care ecosystem was convened to develop a contemporary, fuller definition of the clinical utility of genomic testing in cancer care.RESULTSWe present an updated definition and offer recommendations for successful implementation.CONCLUSIONApplying this expanded definition will encourage evidence-based use of genomic testing in cancer care by helping physicians and other health care decision makers account for the broader range of benefits and risks of testing for individual patients, health systems, population health, and scientific advancement.

The Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx (C-GUIDE): Preliminary evidence of validity and reliability

PurposeDemonstrating the clinical utility of genetic testing is fundamental to clinical adoption and reimbursement, but standardized definitions and measurement strategies for this construct do not exist. The Clinician-reported Genetic testing Utility InDEx (C-GUIDE) offers a novel measure to fill this gap. This study assessed its validity and inter-rater reliability. MethodsGenetics professionals completed C-GUIDE after disclosure of test results to patients. Construct validity was assessed using regression analysis to measure associations between C-GUIDE and global item scores as well as potentially explanatory variables. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by administering a vignette-based survey to genetics professionals and calculating Krippendorff’s α. ResultsOn average, a 1-point increase in the global item score was associated with an increase of 3.0 in the C-GUIDE score (P < .001). Compared with diagnostic results, partially/potentially diagnostic and nondiagnostic results were associated with a reduction in C-GUIDE score of 9.5 (P < .001) and 10.2 (P < .001), respectively. Across 19 vignettes, Krippendorff’s α was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.63-0.72). ConclusionC-GUIDE showed acceptable validity and inter-rater reliability. Although further evaluation is required, C-GUIDE version 1.2 can be useful as a standardized approach to assess the clinical utility of genetic testing.

Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in cancer predisposing genes: What are we learning from multigene panels?

One of the main factors influencing the clinical utility of genetic tests for cancer predisposition is the ability to provide actionable classifications (ie pathogenic or benign). However, a large fraction of the variants identified in cancer predisposing genes (CPGs) are of uncertain significance (VUS), and cannot be used for clinical purposes either to identify individuals at risk or to drive treatment.Here we analyze the current status of VUS identification in a subset of 24 CPGs included by the American College of Medical Genetics/Association for Molecular Pathology in the list of genes that should be considered for the return of incidental findings. To this purpose we retrieved published literature using different search strings according to the frequency of the condition and we extracted corresponding data from ClinVar.The total number of VUS has not decreased with time, due to widespread multigene panel testing, and the relative yield of VUS compared to pathogenic variants is higher in more recent studies, which tend to involve series not selected for the presence of specific high risk criteria. In addition, only few studies adopt gene specific interpretation criteria when these are available.Despite the large yield of VUS associated with multigene testing, the data obtained from such studies can be very useful for variant classification, especially for those variants that are more likely to be benign, since these are expected to be detected more frequently in a population that does not show gene specific manifestations. In addition, wider use of gene specific interpretation criteria should be promoted in order to optimize the interpretation process.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Kidney Disease-Related Genes: A Laboratory’s Experience

Introduction: Recent literature highlights the clinical utility of genetic testing for patients with kidney disease. Genetic testing provides significant benefits for reproductive risk counseling, including the option of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M). PGT-M allows for a significant reduction in risk for a pregnancy affected with the familial disease. We aim to summarize our experience with PGT-M for genes with kidney involvement as either a primary or secondary feature of the disease. Methods: All PGT-M tests performed by the reference laboratory between September 2010 and July 2020 were reviewed for clinical indication and cases for which the disease tested included a renal component. Each patient referred for PGT-M had an existing molecular genetic diagnosis themselves or in their family. Frequency of each condition, gene, inheritance pattern, and year over year increase in referral cases was analyzed. Results: In the study cohort, the most common disease targeted was autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, caused by pathogenic variants in the PKD1 or PKD2 genes, which accounted for 16.5% (64/389) of cases. The 5 most common referral indications accounted for 51.9% (202/389) of the cases. Autosomal recessive inheritance accounted for 52.0% (26/50) of conditions for which PGT-M was performed. The number of PGT-M tests performed for conditions that included either primary or secondary kidney disease increased from 5 cases in 2010 to 47 cases in the 2020 study period. Discussion/Conclusion: These data suggest that the pursuit of PGT-M by couples at risk for passing on conditions with a kidney component is common and has significantly increased since 2010. With this rising trend of patients undergoing PGT-M and the prerequisite of molecular genetic confirmation in the PGT-M process, this study underscores the importance of the reproductive component to a molecular genetic diagnosis for patients with kidney disease, especially as the accessibility of genetic testing and utilization by nephrologists grows.

Genetic testing in patients with triple-negative or hereditary breast cancer

In recent years there has been a dramatic evolution in the clinical utility of genetic testing with expanding therapeutic implications for individuals with breast cancer who harbor a germline mutation in BRCA1/2. As these therapeutic opportunities expand and evolve, this requires the clinical and research community to rethink the approach to genetic testing for individuals with breast cancer. Genetic testing is evolving from traditional testing models based on pretest counseling with the aim of identifying hereditary and individual risk for purposes of screening and risk reduction to contemporary models that utilize technology to improve accessibility and oncology led mainstreaming of testing where the oncologist refers for genetic testing, discloses the results and formal counseling occurs later in the process than in traditional models. The cost and accessibility to multigene panel testing have resulted in broad uptake despite the fact that clinical utility and appropriate interpretation of results are not yet well established. Furthermore, somatic testing for genomic alterations may also yield results beyond the disease with detection of germline mutations impacting the individual and their family more broadly than anticipated. With the establishment of poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors as part of the treatment armamentarium for early and advanced breast cancer, paradigms, algorithms, and resources for genetic testing need to rapidly change in order to adapt to the evolution of germline mutations from hereditary and individual risk predictors to predictive therapeutic biomarkers.

Diagnostic and clinical utility of genetic testing in children with kidney failure.

Genetic kidney disease is well established as an important cause of pediatric kidney failure, and genetic testing might increase diagnostic accuracy, but evidence is limited. This study was conducted to determine the diagnostic yield and clinical impact of genetic testing for children with kidney failure. Patients who were diagnosed with kidney failure before 19 years of age at Children's Hospital of Fudan University from 2009 to 2018 and received next-generation sequencing (NGS) were enrolled. The results for likely pathogenic variants in genes known to cause chronic kidney disease (CKD) were analyzed. A molecular diagnosis was identified in 39.9% (75/188) of children with kidney failure. Specific subtype of clinical category was discerned in 54 (72.0%) patients, kidney disease was reclassified in 7 (9.3%) patients, the unknown etiology of 5 (6.7%) patients was molecularly diagnosed, and the clinical diagnoses of the other 9 (12.0%) patients were confirmed. In addition, genetic diagnosis was considered to have contributed to clinical management, including negating the need for kidney biopsy (26/75, 34.7%), avoiding immunosuppressive therapy (24/75, 32.0%), changing surveillance (48/75, 64.0%), guiding specific treatment (21/75, 28.0%), and guiding peri-transplant management and options for kidney transplantation (12/75, 16.0%). Furthermore, cascade testing was subsequently offered to 34.7% (26/75) of families. Genetic testing identified a molecular diagnosis in nearly 40% of children with kidney failure. Our results confirm that in children with kidney failure, genetic testing can not only establish a specific molecular diagnosis, but has a significant impact on clinical management.

Closing the gap: Trends in inconclusive rates on hereditary cancer testing across racial/ethnic groups.

10525 Background: Several groups have described disparities in genetic test results for inherited breast cancer predisposition, with a disproportionate number of variants of unknown significance (VUS) reported in non-Caucasian individuals. These disparities are due in part to the underrepresentation of non-Caucasians in reference databases and clinical genetic testing cohorts. Over the past few years, diversification efforts have been made however, little data exists on how ethnicity- and gene-specific VUS rates have changed over time and whether such disparities have improved or worsened. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed demographic information and test results for individuals who underwent hereditary cancer multigene panel testing between March 2012 and September 2020 at a single laboratory. Individuals who self-reported as African American, Asian, Caucasian, or Hispanic on the test requisition form and whose testing included ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and PALB2 (five commonly tested breast cancer predisposition genes with management guidelines) were included in the study (n = 284,130). The frequency of germline variants of unknown significance (VUS) in the five genes was assessed in September 2015 and September 2020. Results: Amongst patients tested between March 2012 and September 2015, 82.8% of the study cohort self-reported as Caucasian and 17.2% were not Caucasian (6.5% African American, 6.0% Hispanic, and 4.6% Asian). The proportion of non-Caucasian individuals in the study cohort increased slightly by September 2020 to 22.8% (77.2% Caucasian, 9.2% African American, 8.4% Hispanic, and 5.3% Asian). Consistent with previous reports, Caucasians had the lowest VUS rate overall in both 2015 and 2020. This was also true at the individual gene level, with the exception of CHEK2. Over time, we observed a relative decrease in VUS rates across all ethnicities. Between 2015 and 2020, the overall VUS rate for the five included genes in non-Caucasian individuals was reduced by 32.0% in non-Caucasians compared to 23.6% in Caucasians. The absolute difference in VUS rate between non-Caucasians and Caucasians decreased from 7.9% in 2015 to 4.5% in 2020. Conclusions: While VUS rates for commonly tested breast cancer predisposition genes remain higher in non-Caucasians relative to Caucasians, our results demonstrate that this gap has been reduced over a five-year time period. These findings may be indicative of efforts by clinicians and laboratories to reduce these disparities. Further studies are necessary to improve the clinical utility of genetic testing in under-represented populations.[Table: see text]

Absence of known feline MYH7 and MYBPC3 variants in a diverse cohort of cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common cause of heart disease in the domestic cat with a genetic predisposition in a few breeds. In the Maine Coon and Ragdoll breeds, two variants associated with the HCM phenotype have been identified in the cardiac myosin binding protein C gene (MYBPC3; p.Ala31Pro and p.Arg820Trp respectively), and a single variant has been identified in the myosin heavy chain gene (MYH7; p.Glu1883Lys) in one domestic cat with HCM. It is not known if these variants influence the development of HCM in other cohorts of the feline population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of the known MYBPC3 and MYH7 variants in a population of cats with HCM. DNA was isolated from samples collected from non-Ragdoll and non-Maine Coon domestic cats diagnosed with HCM through the North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine and genotyped for the three variants. One-hundred and three DNA samples from cats with HCM were evaluated from domestic shorthair, domestic longhair and purebred cats. All samples were wt for the MYBPC3 and MYH7 variants. Although this study was limited by its inclusion of cats from one tertiary hospital, the lack of these MYBPC3 and MYH7 variants in this feline HCM population indicates that the clinical utility of genetic testing for these variants may be isolated to the two cat breeds in which these variants have been identified. Further studies to identify the causative variants for the feline HCM population are warranted.